Skip to main content

Despina Vandi in the warmest embrace "My baby"

Minnesota becomes fourth state to offer universal free school meals




 MINNEAPOLIS — Starting this fall, students at Minnesota schools will get free meals regardless of their ability to pay.

A bill signed into law Friday, March 17, by Gov. Tim Walz provides more than $800 million in funding for school lunches and breakfasts over the next four years. A free meals program was one of the top priorities this session for the governor and Democratic-Farmer-Labor lawmakers, who say they want to craft a state budget that will prioritize education and families.

Surrounded by students and supporters of the measure in the cafeteria at Webster Elementary School in Minneapolis on Friday, Lt. Gov Peggy Flanagan said providing meals will give students without access to enough food at home a better shot at succeeding in school.

"For far too many of our young people, the school cafeteria has been a place of shame and stigma," she said before Walz signed the bill into law. "Our students with lunch debts are students who skipped meals. Hunger is often invisible. It looks like distraction or tiredness or disinterest. It can be easy to miss the students who are falling behind because they're trying to learn on an empty stomach."

About one-third of Minnesota’s more than 800,000 public school students qualify for free or reduced-price lunches, according to Department of Education estimates — 275,000 students. The Hunger-Free Schools coalition, which includes Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota and food bank Second Harvest Heartland, estimates that one out of every six Minnesota children doesn’t have consistent access to nutritious food.


Minnesota is the fourth state to create a free school lunch program, Walz said. Other states such as California and Maine have universal lunch programs and Colorado voters in November approved a new tax on its wealthiest residents to create a free school lunch program.


The Senate approved the bill Tuesday 38-26. A House proposal authored by Rep. Sydney Jordan, DFL-Minneapolis, passed in February 70-58.

Supporters say the program would relieve financial stress on students and families, help kids do better in school, and reduce the stigma or shame by guaranteeing all students access to the same food. House Majority Leader Jamie Long, DFL-Minneapolis, said the program could save some families $800-$1,000 each year.

Under the free meals program, students would be guaranteed access to the same school lunch provided to all other students under federal nutrition guidelines. Other options in cafeterias, such as snack bars where students can purchase items like sugary drinks, would not be covered by the funding.

Schools in the federal school meals program provide free breakfast and lunch to all students. Just one Minnesota school district, Wayzata in the western Twin Cities suburbs, does not participate in the program.

Initial funding would start in the 2024 fiscal year, with $190 million. That amount would increase to $213 million by 2027.

Republican opponents of the bill raised concerns about the potential for waste and misappropriations. Others said the state would be better off spending money on improving reading and math scores. Sen. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, got national attention for remarking on the Senate floor that he had never met a hungry Minnesotan.


“I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that is hungry,” he said. “I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that says they don’t have access to enough food to eat.”

Flanagan at the Friday bill signing took aim at Drazkowski, and talked about her own experiences growing up on government assistance, including free and reduced-price lunch.

"To our decision makers who believe they have never met someone who is experiencing or has experienced hunger. Hi. My name is Peggy Flanagan. And I was one in six of those Minnesota children who experienced hunger," she said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The blood runs cold: this hobby of Prince William is terrifying

  Princess Diana was definitely not thrilled. Prince William is not as quiet as he is known today.  The future king has a passion that horrified his mother, Princess Diana. A sweet, quiet and homely child, he loved to chase game through the whole forest with a whoop.  The son of Lady Di became addicted to the favorite hobby of aristocrats as a little boy. At the same time, Charles's wife did not approve of the controversial occupation of the heir.  She was frightened by the bloodthirstiness with which William killed animals.  Some of the scenes give me goosebumps. iphone 14 free tiktok followers “Much to Diana's disgust, he caught his first rabbit at 11 years old.  Three years later, being carried away by this hobby, in Scotland, he killed a deer with one shot, literally covered in blood.  Diana decided that this would pass, and resigned herself to the fact that her eldest son was delighted with the pursuit of prey, ”writes  Marie Clare  , ci...

Deadpool 3 has a tentative release window, Ryan Reynolds is working on the script

  Ryan Reynolds worked with the writers on the  Deadpool 3  storyline  , and best of all, Marvel Studios has a planned release window in mind for the sequel.  After Disney's acquisition of 20th Century Fox, Marvel Studios director Kevin Feige has confirmed that there are still plans to bring Reynolds back for a third  Deadpool  movie.  The problem is, the production process has been rather slow and it's still unclear when the sequel will be released. In a new interview with ComicBook.com, Kevin Feige provided an update on the state of  Deadpool 3  .  He has not revealed when the film may be released, although he has confirmed that behind the scenes Marvel Studios has a tentative release window on the board.  Feige added that  Ryan Reynolds is  working with the writers on the script right now, which seems like another good sign for  Deadpool 3 in  the future. “We do,” Feige said when asked if Marvel had a pen...

Harry can handle himself: Meghan Markle will leave her husband on an important day

  A brunette may regret her going out into the world. The date of the coronation of Charles III is fast approaching.  At the same time, fans of the royal family cannot yet make a final conclusion about whether Meghan Markle and Prince Harry will be present at it. Rumor has it that the Dukes of Sussex were still invited to the ceremony, but there is one caveat.  He can play into the hands of Markle well, experts say.  Do not forget that on the sixth of May, her first-born Archie celebrates her birthday.  The boy is four years old.  It is possible that the former actress will be absent from such an important event, thereby protecting herself from popular wrath. https://mobilizon.fr/events/1af7854a-b60d-4a5a-937c-8e35965004eb https://mobilizon.fr/events/05594c9a-b39b-434a-bc35-846be9cc52a5 https://mobilizon.fr/events/9df3b6a7-5a3b-4b18-849f-fd8c00d3206c https://mobilizon.fr/events/0a150d27-15b6-48ef-b974-a5437b20c693 https://mobilizon.fr/events/fe83dd35-8856-4...